Introduction to APFT Pilot Report - Section 1.2.24

Previous Section

4) What is an egalitarian social system based on kinship ?

The majority of the populations mentioned in this report are egalitarian and their social organization is based on kinship ; it is especially important that one should understand this fact and its implications.

- Saying these societies are egalitarian implies that individuals of both sexes (and in many cases without even taking sexual distinction into account), are considered equal.

- A social system based on kinship implies that, from birth, an individual's social world and his position within it are defined by kinship.

Kinship links members of a society into a network of social security which ensures that their basic material and emotional needs will be taken on by others (whenever necessary and possible, of course). Though these factors may appear very simple, they are part of the social structure and even more fundamental when these societies have to face changes and development.

Leaders


In egalitarian societies4, men earn a position of leadership through their ability and experience. This implies that a group may have several leaders, each specializing in his own sphere. Equality is maintained through a levelling process : those who try to use their superior status and the respect due to them in order to dominate over the other members in the group, are rapidly criticized and brought back to a more modest attitude through this criticism. They may even be ostracized. This is one of the reasons why these societes are said to be acephalous .
The leader is responsible for the community's well-being and is therefore the one who has to distribute most wealth. Influential positions are maintained by being as subtle as possible in maintaining a consensus within the group.
Despite the fact that this is a true democratic system (though without elections), this type of leadership and the process of decision-making that goes with it, often make it difficult for the members of a community to agree over problems that are beyond their own experience and to trust a representative or spokesman with their requests.
Another problem is due to the fact that the village may only be an administrative division that has no connection whatsoever with an endogenous reality. It is therefore often difficult for a stranger to work out who might be representing the group. Arousing group consciousness and developing some form of group representation to deal with the outside world can be a long and laborious process. The career of leaders can be very brief indeed, and they then return to being ordinary group members. The levelling process regulating leadership often implies that communities are split up into groups, each representing itself, and they do not necessarily rally when one particular group makes a decision.


APFT Databank
Next Section
Updated Monday, November 6, 1995